焦點對談 — 以影響力投資帶來轉變

 
影響力投資是一種在追求財務回報的同時,實現可衡量的正面社會及環境影響的投資方式。即使在各類可持續投資備受質疑的環境下,影響力投資日益獲投資者關注。

 
可持續融合主管Berenice Lasfargues與首席市場策略師Daniel Morris探討這種投資方式的特點,例如投資於為讀寫障礙兒童提供教育工具,或提供可負擔住房的公司。Berenice指出,部份投資者會專門配置資金用作影響力投資,亦有投資者選擇與資產管理公司合作。

您亦可以在YouTube上收聽和訂閱焦點對談(Talking Heads)。

XXX BNP AM

閲讀文字記錄(只供英文版本)

This is an edited audio transcript of the Talking Heads episode with Berenice Lasfargues

Daniel Morris: Hello and welcome to the BNP Parry by Asset Management Talking Heads podcast. Every week, Talking Heads will bring you in-depth insights and analysis through the lens of sustainability on the topics that really matter to investors. In this episode, we’ll be discussing impact investing. I’m Daniel Morris, Chief Market Strategist, and I’m joined today by Berenice Lasfargues, Sustainability Integration Lead from our Sustainability Centre. Welcome, Baroness, and thanks for joining me.

Berenice Lasfargues: Great to be here, Daniel.

DM: We’re talking about impact investing, but perhaps some of our listeners are not necessarily all that familiar with the concept. Let’s start with the layman’s definition of impact investing.

BL: First, it’s important to acknowledge that different organisations and firms may have different views on what impact investing means in practice. However, the GIIN, which is a global impact investing network [and] one of the leading standard-setting organisations, has been recognised as having coined the mainstream definition of impact investment, which are investments made with an intention to generate positive, measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return.

If you take this definition apart, you’ll see that all the words are quite deliberate. They refer specifically to the three common building blocks of impact that are widely shared by the industry. The first one is intentionality. So, that means that impact and impact investment can’t be unintended or a byproduct. They are a focal point. So that can be having an impact on climate change or trying to solve education challenges. The second one is additionality. That is the fact that the positive impact from the investment would have not occurred without the investor’s involvement. For example, engagement could be a channel of additionality. But there’s also other forms such as providing below market rate financing, providing capital to populations that otherwise do not have access to that capital. The third pillar is impact management, meaning that the environmental or social performance of the investment must be measurable, reported, and more importantly, it needs to be managed.

DM: Now that we have a better concept of what impact investing is, why do you see investors interested in this area today?

BL: That’s an excellent question. We’re in a world where there is growing scepticism around what ESG products deliver. Here you have impact investment, a product that by design looks to target the most pressing challenges that the world has and has baked transparency and accountability in the product design itself. To make it concrete, if we look at some of our impact investment, we have a fund that invests in companies targeting healthcare and well-being. We invest in [an] education company that supplies tools for children with dyslexia and other connective needs with multilingual background. There’s growing appetite to look at not just at ESG, but also at the direction of travel towards impact and how our investments actually contribute to changes on the ground and the world’s most pressing challenges.

DM: Can you give us some examples of how institutional investors are going about implementing impact investing?

BL: Asset owners’ attitudes towards impact do vary, but over the more recent years, we see a growing range of asset owners being impact-curious and some have dedicated allocations to impact in their portfolios and we see them doing so primarily in three ways. Some would have specific allocation targets. For example, PGGM, which is a pension fund in the Netherlands, has 10% of their private equity allocations earmarked for impact investments. Another one is creating their own platform. For example, Temasek, a state-owned investor from Singapore, decided to launch their platform to target impact investments in Asia with a focus on private equity. And a third way of entering the market is partnering with asset managers. We have been approached by clients around the question [of] advising them on the topic and working alongside them on their impact journey.

DM: If I can summarise a couple of the key points, we can start with the definition you gave us that impact investing is about investments made with the intention to generate positive, measurable social environmental impact alongside a financial return. You do see increasing interest in the area from investors. You highlighted some of the different ways that institutional investors are going about impact investing, talking about allocation targets, developing their own platforms or partnering with asset managers. Berenice, thank you very much for joining me.

BL: Thank you, Daniel. It was my pleasure to be here.

DM: That’s it for this week’s episode of Talking Heads. If you would like more information about our capabilities and impact investing, please reach out to your BNP Paribas Asset Management contact or check out Viewpoint, our website for investment insights at viewpoint.bnpparibas-am.com. Just before we go, I’d like to mention that the Talking Heads podcast is available on Spotify and on YouTube. For YouTube, visit youtube.com/BNPP AM slash playlist and tap or click on Talking Heads. You’ve been listening to the BNP Paribas Asset Management Talking Heads podcast with me, Daniel Morris, and Bernice Lafargues, Sustainability Integration Lead. Please do join me next week. Until then, take care.

重要資訊

文章可能包含專業術語,並不適合非專業投資經驗使用。 本資料中的觀點和意見乃是作者於文章出版日期發表,以公開資料為基礎,並可予更改而毋須通知。個別投資組合管理團隊可能持有不同的觀點,並可能為不同客戶作出不同的投資決策。本資料並不構成投資建議。 投資價值及其收益可升亦可跌,投資者可能無法取回最初的投資金額。過往表現並非未來回報的保證。 投資於新興市場、專門或受限制行業,波幅可能高於平均水平,因為這類投資的集中程度較高,亦因可提供的資訊較少而帶來較高不確定性,而且流動性較低,或對市況(社會、政治及經濟狀況)變動的敏感度較高。 相比國際大部份已發展市場,若干新興市場提供的保障較少。因此,代表投資於新興市場的基金提供投資組合交易、平倉及保本服務或附帶較大風險。

環境、社會及管治(ESG)投資風險:歐盟未有就納入ESG及可持續發展標準制定共同或統一的定義及標籤,可能令基金經理在訂立ESG目標時採取不同的策略。此亦意味著可能難以比較納入ESG及可持續發展標準的策略,因為用於物色投資的篩選條件及比重可能基於具有相同名稱但具有不同潛在含義的指標。根據ESG及可持續發展準則評估證券時,投資經理亦可使用外部ESG研究供應商所提供的數據來源。鑑於ESG的性質不斷發展,這些數據來源可能暫時不完整、不準確或未能提供。在投資流程應用負責任商業行為標準,可能令若干發行人的證券被排除。因此,子基金的表現可能不時優於或遜於未有應用上述標準的同類基金。

Back to Top