焦點對談 — 動盪市況下的ETF資金流向與趨勢

今年初,交易所買賣基金(ETF)的股票資金流向分歧:美國ETF錄得資金外流;歐洲、新興市場及中國ETF則錄得資金流入。近期,隨著關稅消息衝擊金融市場,整體資金流有所放緩。然而,主題ETF仍獲市場青睞,尤其是國防類ETF。環境、社會及管治(ESG)領域方面,緊貼基準指數的產品仍具吸引力。

首席市場策略師Daniel Morris與ETF研究主管Daniel Dornel的季度ETF podcast深入探討上述及其他議題。

您亦可以在YouTube上收聽和訂閱焦點對談(Talking Heads)。

XXX BNP AM

閲讀文字記錄(只供英文版本)

Talking Heads podcast with Daniel Dornel on ETF flows and trends

Daniel Morris: Hello and welcome to the BNP Paribas Asset Management Talking Heads podcast. Every week, Talking Heads will bring you in-depth insights and analysis through the lens of sustainability on the topics that really matter to investors. In this episode, we’ll be discussing macroeconomic developments and how those have been reflected in ETF markets. I’m Daniel Morris, Chief Market Strategist, and I’m joined today by Daniel Dornel, Head of ETF Research. Welcome, Danielle, and thanks for joining me.

Daniel Dornel: Hi Daniel, thank you for inviting me.

DM: Let’s start with the evolution we’ve seen in the markets and in macroeconomic expectations. At the beginning of November, prior to the US election, the expectations were for a nice soft landing, meaning you would see a slowdown in growth in the US, inflation moves back towards target and the Fed starts to cut rates. The first change that occurred with Trump’s victory. We anticipated a lot of pro-growth policies that would keep US growth strong. During the first quarter of this year, we started to see marginally weaker economic data and weakness in equity prices reflecting that slower growth. We’ve had volatility since on the tariff front. These announcements are taking place now in a context where US economic growth was slowing. The other thing that we saw was very strong performance from European equity markets, reflecting a rebound in sentiment. Now with the tariff announcements, Europe, along with most equity markets, has been taking a step back. So, Daniel, when you look at how ETF flows have evolved over the last several months, let’s start with Europe.

DD: Since the beginning of February, we have seen a switch in terms of investor interest. US equity flows stopped. In the meantime, European equity products surged, and February was a record month with over 8 billion (euro) in flows for European ETFs. It was better in March with just under 14 billion (euro) in flows in European equity ETFs. This makes it the largest quarter for European equities with just under 25 billion (euro).

DM: We’ve seen then very strong inflows in European equities in the first quarter. Any expectations on whether those inflows are going to persist?

DD: It’s very difficult to forecast what’s going to happen. But if we look at what has happened since the end of March, we have seen a continuing trend of outflows on US equities. In the meantime, global developed market equities and European equities are still on the positive trend. Overall, we had like 1.5 billion (euro) in inflows, led by eurozone equities.

DM: Do you see any other patterns, if I’m thinking about thematic strategies – defence ETFs ? Are you seeing a lot of movement in those areas?

DD: If we are thinking about the other interesting trends on the market, first on the equity side, we have seen strong interest on emerging market equities and especially China. We’ve had a record quarter in Q1 2025 with over 4 billion inflows in Chinese equity ETFs. The second big trend in the equity space: thematic. It was a very strong quarter for thematic ETFs, the strongest one since Q1 2021. We have seen 4.5 billion inflows into thematic ETFs, dominated by defence. This is a trend that has picked up. If we move away from equities and we are thinking about fixed income, we have seen in Q1 14 billion in inflows, dominated by ultra-short products. People have been looking for a low-risk asset class.

DM: That’s an interesting point about the inflows that you had to emerging market and particularly Chinese equities. We saw that in the performance of Chinese equities in the first quarter following the DeepSeek announcement #1 and then #2 the meeting you have between Xi Jinping and the leaders for the tech sector in China showing that the government was supporting that part of the economy. I’m curious how flows have been in April given what’s happening on the tariff side.

DD: So, for global emerging market exposures, it’s still slightly positive. We’ve just over 100 million in flows since the beginning of the month. When it comes to China equities, it’s negative since the beginning of the month: we’ve just over 350 million in outflows.

DM: Let’s pick up on another topic. If we think about changes in how investors are allocating their funds, what do you see in terms of flows to ESG ETFs?

DD: ESG flows are down 9% in Q1 2025. It’s low compared to 2024 and previous years. It’s mainly led by a decrease in ESG in the equity space. The idea is that the lower tracking error introduced by ESG on fixed income can be an explanation. If we look into the details of this dynamic in the equity space, we have seen strong outflows on a very selective ESG product, while the flows on less selective ones with a lower tracking error have seen strong inflows. That’s a trend that started last year, but that has amplified since the beginning of the year. So, there are still areas where ESG really gathers interest.

DM: What’s happening with active ETFs?

DD: Active ETF has been really of interest for investors and 2024 was a record year with around 20 billion in inflows. Q1 2025 has been the strongest start of the year, even better than 2024. We have seen over 6 billion in inflows dominated by equities, once again led by Europe and global exposures. On the fixed income side, it’s also on ultra-short exposures. March was the record month for flows into active ETFs – the strongest month ever.

DM: If we could summarise some of the key points you shared with us. We’ve seen initially strong inflows into US ETFs. Now that’s turned to outflows and instead we’ve seen inflows into European ETFs, emerging markets, in China, That’s waned in April with all the news on the tariff front. By contrast, continued interest in thematic ETFs, particularly for defence sector ETFs. Within the ESG space, you highlighted that particularly lower tracking products are continuing to see interest in fixed income. And then you noted that March was a record month for inflows into active ETFs. Well, Daniel, thank you very much for joining me.

DD: Thank you very much, Daniel. It was a pleasure.

DM: That’s it for this week’s episode of Talking Heads. If you would like more information about our capabilities and ETFs, please reach out to your BNP Paribas Asset Management contact or check out Viewpoint, our website for investment insights at viewpoint.bnpparibas-am.com. Viewpoint brings you commentary and analysis in a variety of formats, from investment outlooks to asset allocation videos and podcasts to help investors make better informed decisions. You’ve been listening to the BNP Paribas Asset Management Talking Heads podcast with me, Daniel Morris, and Daniel Dornel, Head of ETF Research. Please do join me next week. Until then, take care.

重要資訊

文章可能包含專業術語,並不適合非專業投資經驗使用。 本資料中的觀點和意見乃是作者於文章出版日期發表,以公開資料為基礎,並可予更改而毋須通知。個別投資組合管理團隊可能持有不同的觀點,並可能為不同客戶作出不同的投資決策。本資料並不構成投資建議。 投資價值及其收益可升亦可跌,投資者可能無法取回最初的投資金額。過往表現並非未來回報的保證。 投資於新興市場、專門或受限制行業,波幅可能高於平均水平,因為這類投資的集中程度較高,亦因可提供的資訊較少而帶來較高不確定性,而且流動性較低,或對市況(社會、政治及經濟狀況)變動的敏感度較高。 相比國際大部份已發展市場,若干新興市場提供的保障較少。因此,代表投資於新興市場的基金提供投資組合交易、平倉及保本服務或附帶較大風險。

環境、社會及管治(ESG)投資風險:歐盟未有就納入ESG及可持續發展標準制定共同或統一的定義及標籤,可能令基金經理在訂立ESG目標時採取不同的策略。此亦意味著可能難以比較納入ESG及可持續發展標準的策略,因為用於物色投資的篩選條件及比重可能基於具有相同名稱但具有不同潛在含義的指標。根據ESG及可持續發展準則評估證券時,投資經理亦可使用外部ESG研究供應商所提供的數據來源。鑑於ESG的性質不斷發展,這些數據來源可能暫時不完整、不準確或未能提供。在投資流程應用負責任商業行為標準,可能令若干發行人的證券被排除。因此,子基金的表現可能不時優於或遜於未有應用上述標準的同類基金。

Back to Top