ポートフォリオにおける自然資本の役割

今回のポッドキャスト「Highlighting the role of natural capital in portfolios」では、IWC(インターナショナル・ウッドランド・カンパニー社)のチーフ・コマーシャル・オフィサーであるCeline Claudonが、BNPパリバ・アセットマネジメントのインベストメント・インサイト・センター共同責任者であるAndy Craigとの対談を通じて、森林や農地のような自然資本が、機関投資家のポートフォリオにおいて果たす役割について解説します。

Celineは自然資本への投資について、株式や債券など伝統資産と相関が低いことから分散効果が高いことに加えて、気候変動や生物多様性の損失に対するソリューションにもつながると強調しています。また対談では、AI(人工知能)のような急速に発展する技術が、リモートセンシング、インパクト測定、炭素隔離や生物多様性の改善などに関する詳細な情報開示において果たす役割についても触れています。

“Talking heads”はBNPパリバ・アセットマネジメントが提供するポッドキャストにおける投資情報のプログラムです。今後も投資家の皆様にとって、重要なトピックに関する詳細なインサイトに加え、サステナビリティの観点から世界の市場分析を行い、投資プロフェッショナルとのより有意義な対話を展開します。

*当プログラムは英語のみとなります。英語スクリプトは、以下よりご覧いただけます。

XXX BNP AM

Read the transcript

Talking Heads podcast with Celine Claudon

Andrew Craig: Hello and welcome to the BNP Paribas Asset Management Talking Heads podcast. Our aim is to bring you in-depth insights and analysis on the topics that really matter to investors. In this episode, we’ll be discussing the role natural capital can play in an institutional investor portfolios. I’m Andy Craig, Co-Head of the Investment Insights Centre, and I’m joined today by Celine Claudon, Chief Commercial Officer for the International Woodland Company, also known as IWC.

By way of introduction, let me explain that IWC, based in Copenhagen, is a leading natural resources investment company with deep experience in global timberland agriculture and responsible investment. The BNP Paribas Group acquired a majority stake in IWC in 2023. They bring their long experience and expertise in the provision of investment services for natural resources.

Welcome, Celine, and thank you for joining me today.

Celine Claudon: Hello, Andy. Great to be here.

AC: Let’s start by talking about the factors driving the interest from institutional investors in forestry today. Would you say that they’re purely financial or are they also linked to broader sustainability goals? And how have they evolved over time?

CC: Yes, of course. When I started working with natural capital 20 years ago, institutional investors were purely investing for the financial characteristics of the asset class. Those are mainly inflation hedging, diversification due to the fact that timberland especially, and agriculture also, have no correlation with bonds and equities. And the attractive risk return profile. That was 20 years ago, and until probably 10 years ago, [that] was the case: purely financial considerations from investors. Today, the importance of climate change, the carbon footprint, and lately the biodiversity crisis, are getting more and more into the mind of investors. They may even have become the main key reasons for investing in natural capital.

AC: Timberland has traditionally been seen as a good hedge against inflation and as a means of diversifying portfolios. The investment case has been strengthened by the sustainability characteristics of the asset class. What about misconceptions that investors may have about forestry as an asset class?

CC: First, I will say that many investors still assume forestry is a long-term illiquid asset. In reality, though, you can design a diversified portfolio across age, class, sales and structures to actively manage liquidity. Sustainable forestry typically offers a 2-4% annual cash yield, which is highly valued by pension funds and insurers because it aligns well with their long-term liabilities. The cash yield can even be higher when investing in farmland, for example.

Another misconception is that returns depend primarily on carbon credits. In fact, timber, the sale of wood, remains the main value driver for most forestry investments with carbon revenues providing an optional upside. While dedicated carbon strategies do exist, the core income and return driver of most sustainable forestry investment is still the sale of timber to meet the rising global demand for renewable materials.

Turning to the main barrier for new investors today, it’s simply where to place natural capital within their strategic asset allocation. Many are wondering, is it part of the alternatives bucket? Is it real estate, green infrastructure, inflation hedging strategies? My hope and my expectation is that in the coming years, natural capital will become a standalone allocation and that its unique characteristics will be fully recognised.

AC: The idea that investors would have an allocation to natural capital would make a lot of sense, and it would probably be something that we could expect to see in coming years. At the moment, what do you see as the main trends or the forces working in favour of natural capital investing?

CC: First of all, more and more investors are looking at natural capital investment as an investment that can contribute to solving climate change and biodiversity loss. It usually takes a long time for them to actually make the first investment because it is so niche. But we see an uptick in the interest from investors.

On the revenue side, there are more new revenue streams that make the returns attractive from not only the sale of the wood, but also from carbon credits, potentially biodiversity credits, and other income. Then there’s a technology progress, AI, remote sensing, blockchains, more from an operational perspective. That is key when we measure impact. We can actually do detailed reporting to investors into, for example, carbon sequestration, biodiversity improvements.

And maybe finally regulation. Regulation can be a burden, but for investments that are as sustainable as natural capital, it is a push. Regulatory framework are actually supporting natural capital as an asset class.

AC: To wind up my questions, what if you had to give one piece of advice to investors considering an allocation to natural capital or forestry? What would it be?

CC: I would say, don’t let that lack of a bucket keep you from investing in an asset class that will provide financial and environmental benefit to your portfolio. Please look further than just the bucket and I can’t do it because it’s not in my strategic allocation. The second one will be, there are numerous strategies within natural capital. You need to make sure you get acquainted with what are those strategies and what are the different managers offering those and decide what is the ideal balance between risk, return and impact that you want to make. Investing, for example, in a core timberland in the US might be great for one investor, but another would prefer to invest in regenerative agriculture in Brazil. There are a lot of opportunities within natural capital.

AC: It sounds like a compelling case both for natural capital and for forestry. Thank you very much, Celine, for joining me today.

CC: You’re very welcome.

AC: That’s it for this week’s episode of Talking Heads. If you’d like more information on natural capital or investing in timberland, please reach out to your BNP Paribas Asset Management contact or to go to Viewpoint, our website for investment insights @ viewpoint.bnpparibas-am.com. You’ve been listening to the BNP Paribas Asset Management Talking Heads podcast with Celine Claudon from the International Woodland Company. Please do join us again next time. Until then, take care.

重要な情報

本資料はBNPパリバ・アセットマネジメント グループが作成した情報提供用資料を、BNPパリバ・アセットマネジメント株式会社が翻訳したもので、特定の金融商品の取得勧誘を目的としたものではありません。また、金融商品取引法に基づく開示書類ではありません。当社は、翻訳や編集には正確性を期していますが、必ずしもその完全性を担保するものではありません。万一、英語と翻訳との間に齟齬がある場合には、英語の原文が優先することをご了承下さい。 本資料における統計等は、信頼できると思われる外部情報等に基づいて作成しておりますが、その正確性や完全性を保証するものではありません。本資料には専門用語や専門的な内容が含まれる可能性がある点をご留意ください。本資料中の情報は作成時点のものであり、予告なく変更する場合があります。本資料中の過去の実績に関する数値、図表、見解や予測などを含むいかなる内容も将来の運用成績を示唆または保証するものではありません。本資料で使用している商標等に係る著作権等の知的財産権、その他一切の権利は、当該商標等の権利者に帰属します。 BNPパリバ・アセットマネジメント株式会社は、記載された情報の正確性及び完全性について、明示的であるか黙示的であるかを問わず、なんらの表明又は保証を行うものではなく、また、一切の責任を負いません。なお、事前の承諾なく掲載した見解、予想、資料等を複製、転用等することはお断りいたします。 投資した資産の価値や分配金は変動する可能性があり、投資家は投資元本を回収できない可能性があります。新興国市場、または専門的なセクター、制限されたセクターへの投資は、入手可能な情報が少なく流動性が低いため、また市場の状況(社会的、政治的、経済的状況)の変化により敏感に反応しやすいため、より不安定性があり、大きな変動を受ける可能性があります。

環境・社会・ガバナンス(ESG)投資に関するリスク:ESGと持続可能性を統合する際、EU基準で共通または統一された定義やラベルがないため、ESG目標を設定する際に資産運用会社によって異なるアプローチが取られる場合があります。これはESGと持続可能性の基準を統合した投資戦略を比較することが困難であることを意味しており、同じ名称が用いられていても異なる測定方法に基づいている場合があるということです。保有銘柄のESGや持続可能性に関する評価において、資産運用会社は、外部のESG調査会社から提供されたデータソースを活用する場合があります。ESG投資は発展途上の分野であるため、こうしたデータソースは不完全、不正確、または利用できない場合があります。投資プロセスにおいて責任ある企業行動指針を適用することで、特定の発行体やセクターが除外される場合があります。その結果、当該指針を適用しない類似の投資戦略のパフォーマンスよりも良くなったり、悪くなったりする場合があります。

Back to Top