Sustainable by nature sequel – ‘Reconnecting to our ocean’

It is essential that we understand the role of our ocean in maintaining a healthy planet and a sustainable economy. So, what are the pressing issues behind degradation and the threat to countless jobs? What can be done to protect the biodiversity of our ocean, which is home to innumerable species and provides vital services? Robert-Alexandre Poujade provides some answers on Ocean Day.

Read ‘Sustainable by Nature Sequel: Reconnecting to Our Ocean’1and find out the effects of rapid industrialisation of the ocean – an ecosystem covering 71% of the Earth’s surface with an annual economic value of USD 2.5 trillion.

Our paper highlights drivers of ocean degradation including overfishing, habitat destruction, and pollution. It explores the impact of climate change on biodiversity, coral reefs and other vital species. It also discusses the role of international policy in protecting the ocean and the future of the global ocean economy.

We are committed to taking measures to safeguard our ocean, including research on ocean-related themes such as seafood, plastics and chemicals. We are expanding our analysis to other sectors to understand how to prioritise species conservation.

We are working with data providers on their support for changes in investment decision-making, as well as with ocean-related partners and stakeholders to build effective stewardship initiatives and robust strategies for our clients. Our goal is to drive impactful change to ensure a sustainable and equitable future for our ocean and the communities and economies that rely on it.

[1] Also see https://www.bnpparibas-am.com/en/forward-thinking/sustainable-by-nature-sequel-our-portfolio-biodiversity-footprint/ 

Important information

Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment risk: The lack of common or harmonised definitions and labels integrating ESG and sustainability criteria at EU level may result in different approaches by managers when setting ESG objectives. This also means that it may be difficult to compare strategies integrating ESG and sustainability criteria to the extent that the selection and weightings applied to select investments may be based on metrics that may share the same name but have different underlying meanings. In evaluating a security based on the ESG and sustainability criteria, the Investment Manager may also use data sources provided by external ESG research providers. Given the evolving nature of ESG, these data sources may for the time being be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable. Applying responsible business conduct standards in the investment process may lead to the exclusion of securities of certain issuers. Consequently, (the Sub-Fund’s) performance may at times be better or worse than the performance of relatable funds that do not apply such standards.

Back to Top