Mitigating drivers of biodiversity loss will create new markets

Biodiversity has rapidly risen up corporate and investor agendas, with growing recognition of the economy’s farreaching dependency on ‘ecosystem services’, notes Impax Asset Management[1], a delegated manager of BNP Paribas Asset Management.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) estimates biodiversity underpins more than half of global GDP and the 2022 COP15 biodiversity summit agreed to mobilise USD 200 billion a year in finance for biodiversity by 2030.

There is, however, limited information on how companies address nature‑related risks and opportunities. Enhanced disclosures should ultimately enable investors such as us — and our clients — to make better informed investment decisions.

The scarcity of reporting is a function of the complexity of measuring both impacts and dependencies on biodiversity and natural capital. Unlike climate change, for which greenhouse gas emissions and avoided emissions are measurable indicators of a company’s impact, biodiversity has no simple global metric and is highly location specific. There is also limited understanding of where and how companies depend on nature in their operations.

We believe bridging the information gap is a crucial step towards addressing this issue and advocate firmly for enhanced disclosure requirements. After the publication of the final recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature‑related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) last September, we have seen a strong uptick in companies’ interest and reporting on the topic.

Improving naturerelated practices and reporting

There are three potential drivers towards widespread adoption of nature‑related reporting:

  • Some companies are already beginning to voluntarily report in line with the TNFD framework, with others publicly committing to doing so. Norms and investor expectations should evolve as they have for climate‑related reporting.
  • It looks likely that corporate reporting standards will help move TNFD into the mainstream. The International Sustainability Standards Board looks set to incorporate the TNFD framework, as it has the Taskforce on Climate‑related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
  • We expect the COP16 biodiversity summit — to be held in late 2024 — to focus on mechanisms for realising the ambitions of COP15, including mobilising private finance to protect and repair the natural environment.

To date, investors have focused on addressing commodity‑driven tropical deforestation, a highly visible and significant cause of global forest loss.

Capturing opportunities and addressing risks

TNFD primarily focuses on the risks facing companies given their myriad dependencies on nature. However, biodiversity‑related opportunities are also an important part of the framework.

The Intergovernmental Science‑Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) identifies five overarching direct drivers of biodiversity loss: 

  • The changing use of land and sea (which includes deforestation)
  • The direct exploitation of organisms (such as overfishing)
  • Climate change
  • Pollution
  • Invasive species

There are measures that can address and alleviate the pressures on ecosystems from each of these drivers. In turn, we believe these can create long‑term opportunities for investors.

Three of these five areas present familiar territory for us, as we have invested in environmental solutions for over two decades:

  • First is climate: most solutions that enable the transition to a low‑carbon economy will by extension help protect ecosystems that are vulnerable to the effects of climate change.
  • Second, pollution: the state of biodiversity is intimately connected with air, soil, and water quality. For instance, companies involved in the testing and treatment of water can help control pollution and reduce or prevent harm to water‑borne life.
  • Third, changing land use: global demand for timber and commodities is driving the conversion of natural forests into tree plantations, crops, and grazing land. Packaging companies whose products advance circularity can reduce the use of virgin materials, and so pressure on the land.

Solutions to the other two drivers of biodiversity loss are emerging.

  • Sustainable aquaculture can help avoid overfishing, for example.
  • Providers of water ballast treatment can help the shipping industry prevent the spread of invasive marine species — an issue that causes at least USD 23 billion in economic losses each year.

As with investing in climate solutions, there are times when addressing a driver of biodiversity loss may still contribute to the issue. Importantly, it does not restore the biodiversity we have already lost, which is another task ahead of us.

Better data and disclosure are critical steps in shining a light on the issues and enabling an accurate assessment — and valuation — of the risks and opportunities associated with biodiversity loss and its mitigation. Only then will capital flow to where it is needed.

1] This is an extract from Outlook 2024 – Why prospects for a more sustainable economy remain undimmed

Disclaimer

Important information

Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment risk: The lack of common or harmonised definitions and labels integrating ESG and sustainability criteria at EU level may result in different approaches by managers when setting ESG objectives. This also means that it may be difficult to compare strategies integrating ESG and sustainability criteria to the extent that the selection and weightings applied to select investments may be based on metrics that may share the same name but have different underlying meanings. In evaluating a security based on the ESG and sustainability criteria, the Investment Manager may also use data sources provided by external ESG research providers. Given the evolving nature of ESG, these data sources may for the time being be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable. Applying responsible business conduct standards in the investment process may lead to the exclusion of securities of certain issuers. Consequently, (the Sub-Fund’s) performance may at times be better or worse than the performance of relatable funds that do not apply such standards.

Back to Top